And as Paul Harvey said, and now for the rest of the story. Yes Jesse was there, yes he went into the Capitol but the parts this reporter so conveniently leaves out is that inside Jesse was beaten even though trying to reverse course. Its a bit hard to do when the whole hallway behind you is loaded with people coming in.
And that the point where Jesse reached up at the helmet of the officer its not with a close fist and even a blind man could see there was a billy club coming down towards his head. I guess this writer has never been in a confusing enviroment. I find it not a bit unusual that the hallway where he was first beaten had no cameras. Seems you would have to know that if you planned to make that the point where you assaulted people.
On not talking with to the FBI, quite honestly unless you have fully downed the Kool Aid you would know the record of the FBI currently is quite sketch. And as speaking at events telling his story, this writer is using her time to tell things the way she wants other to believe. I would guess Jesse should be afforded that same right.
She left out that in the trial the prosecutor tried to identify some other guy as Jesse, to which Jesse made it clear it wasnt him. The prosecutor then made a treat to bring forth a witness to that, but the judge let him know that it wasnt obviously not Jesse because their clothing was totally different. The prosecutor withdrew.
Now lastly, the writer says Jesse broke his trial agreement by doing two events out of state. The writer either has bad sources or illinformed ones. The FBI did tell him they were going to come get him for said violation, and the Judge talked with Jesse and when Jesse informed that no where in the agreement was he mandated to inform the FBI if he left the state. The Judge agreed and simply asked that in the future if he left the state would he let the FBI know. I like sound journalism, and since the writer seems infatuated with January 6 perhaps she would like to do a story on Jeremy Brown who was approached by the FBI to be an insider, refused but recored the conversation. And what do you know after he exposes that he is suddenly arrested. January 6 was a Federection and I lose respect for reporters that present incomplete facts.
The prosecution did file charges but so answer me this then. Why was Jesse not reincarnated? You want to know why? Because the judge agreed with Jesse and simply asked him going forward to notify them. So I will wait on your explanation as to why the FBI first called and said they were coming and then suddenly that didn’t happen.
That makes absolutely no sense. If you look on the form you posted the only checked box with tiny tiny print is the last box in other words they added that after this and didn’t have the good sense to use the same font as the entire rest of the document. In case you didn’t understand the FBI called Jesse and said that the next day he would be reincarnated. Jesse called the judge and the judge agreed with him. If you trust today’s FBI after the last several years that’s your choice.
Really enjoyed this, Turtle.
And as Paul Harvey said, and now for the rest of the story. Yes Jesse was there, yes he went into the Capitol but the parts this reporter so conveniently leaves out is that inside Jesse was beaten even though trying to reverse course. Its a bit hard to do when the whole hallway behind you is loaded with people coming in.
And that the point where Jesse reached up at the helmet of the officer its not with a close fist and even a blind man could see there was a billy club coming down towards his head. I guess this writer has never been in a confusing enviroment. I find it not a bit unusual that the hallway where he was first beaten had no cameras. Seems you would have to know that if you planned to make that the point where you assaulted people.
On not talking with to the FBI, quite honestly unless you have fully downed the Kool Aid you would know the record of the FBI currently is quite sketch. And as speaking at events telling his story, this writer is using her time to tell things the way she wants other to believe. I would guess Jesse should be afforded that same right.
She left out that in the trial the prosecutor tried to identify some other guy as Jesse, to which Jesse made it clear it wasnt him. The prosecutor then made a treat to bring forth a witness to that, but the judge let him know that it wasnt obviously not Jesse because their clothing was totally different. The prosecutor withdrew.
Now lastly, the writer says Jesse broke his trial agreement by doing two events out of state. The writer either has bad sources or illinformed ones. The FBI did tell him they were going to come get him for said violation, and the Judge talked with Jesse and when Jesse informed that no where in the agreement was he mandated to inform the FBI if he left the state. The Judge agreed and simply asked that in the future if he left the state would he let the FBI know. I like sound journalism, and since the writer seems infatuated with January 6 perhaps she would like to do a story on Jeremy Brown who was approached by the FBI to be an insider, refused but recored the conversation. And what do you know after he exposes that he is suddenly arrested. January 6 was a Federection and I lose respect for reporters that present incomplete facts.
There are numerous factual inaccuracies regarding your telling of Jesse’s pre trial release violations.
I am looking directly at the document that set the conditions for pre-trial release for Jesse and it clearly states:
“Defendant must notify the Pretrial Services-Middle District Of Florida/Ocala in advance of any travel outside of the district.”
It can found in section 7t of this document:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.252921/gov.uscourts.dcd.252921.11.0.pdf
It also says on his docket on 5/2/24, after the violations were reported by the prosecution:
“Defendant admonished on the record to abide to his pretrial conditions of release.”
He violated. End of story.
The prosecution did file charges but so answer me this then. Why was Jesse not reincarnated? You want to know why? Because the judge agreed with Jesse and simply asked him going forward to notify them. So I will wait on your explanation as to why the FBI first called and said they were coming and then suddenly that didn’t happen.
He wasn't reincarnated because he never died, Jack.
That makes absolutely no sense. If you look on the form you posted the only checked box with tiny tiny print is the last box in other words they added that after this and didn’t have the good sense to use the same font as the entire rest of the document. In case you didn’t understand the FBI called Jesse and said that the next day he would be reincarnated. Jesse called the judge and the judge agreed with him. If you trust today’s FBI after the last several years that’s your choice.
Btw spell check can be a pain but I would have assumed you would have understood it was incarcerated
Sorry, I expect accuracy in comments so I take them at face value.
You do realize that not ever pretrial violation results in remand to custody, correct? A lot don't.